P3D Re: New Member sends greetings (hobbies)

[Dan Shelley <dshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck Field-ECF004 wrote:
> In some cases, the cost may be a factor.  Such may be true for
> lenticulars.  It cost me over thirty bucks to buy a DISPOSABLE lenticular
> 3-D
> camera, and get the shots developed.  The results were not very good, and it
> took WEEKS to get my pictures back.
>   I've had more people show interest in taking 3-D when I show them
> lenticulars than when I show my more impressive Realist slides.  Then...
> when
> I tell them what it cost me, they seem very much less interested.

I have showed lenticulars to friends, and they are so impressed
that 7 of them so far have gone out and bought the disposables. 2
are just about to transition over to the "real" versions of the
cameras. The ease of use, and lack of need of an external viewing
device make that particular type of 3D very appealing to most
IMO. If lighting is well thought about, and the subject if 5 to
10 feet or so from the lenses, teh results can be quite amazing!
=)

Dan Shelley
dshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dddesign.com/3dbydan


------------------------------