Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D CD-ROM
- From: "OLE HANSEN" <olejohan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D CD-ROM
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 22:58:45 +0200
A few comments to some of the remarks to one of the most
outstanding CD-ROMs produced in the last 10 (20) years.
ron labbe - ron@xxxxxxxxxxxx - wrote:
>> Boris Starosta writes:
>> One page in the adult section merits your close attention
>> (other than my 3dshowcase, of course): the page listed as
>> "a few varied stereo pairs"
>> file:///3DCD1/ADULT/adult1/index.htm
>> Careful analysis reveals all of these to be very well done
>> conversions from regular monoscopic "flat" photographs.
> I'm guessing that they're not conversions, but sequential
> pairs. Where little would be moving (example I:
> \adult\adult1\soft_m_2.htm
> I see no artifacts, this particular image would be incredibly
> difficult to convert effectively, as most of them would...
> Otherwise I would have totally avoided the adult sextion...
> ron labbe/studio3D
As far as the stereograms in .../adult1/ Ron is right. They can
bee nothing but sequential stereograms. They are certainly not
manipulated 2D photographs.
I am sorry, that the straitlacednes of the USA has put the website
of Stereoskopklubben in the adult categori, as there is nothing
pornographic on our website. When Ron is avoiding this section,
one can only fear, that this section is considered a kind of
"garbagecan", and that only the most "brave of men" will have the
stamina to venture into our website. I find that a pity. The link on
the CD-ROM to our website is outdated (it still works but shows
the old one) and the new website can be found on:
http://hjem.get2net.dk/stereoskopklubben
with new and even more exciting stereograms ;-)
Gabriel, speech therapist, NOT. wrote:
> Incidentally I checked out Mr.Kim's web page and Boris is of
> course right. Pretty decent adult 3-D pics on Boomin3d's web page!
I disagree - they have horizontal errors (10 to 40 pixel) and
the camera base is to big - specially in the portrait.
regards - Ole Hansen - olejohan@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|