P3D Re: XXX DDD

[John Ohrt <johrt@xxxxxxxx>]

ron labbe wrote:
> Or, how about graphic sexuality that you'd rather your children not see?
 
Or, how about programs that you'd rather your children not see?

The problem is that for many, primetime TV already broadcasts material
they deem inappropriate.  However, they only remedy available to these
people is simply make sure the programs are not seen by their children.

All I'm saying is what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. 
If society already forces some to take responsibility for what they
permit their children to watch, why should not all assume the same
responsibility.

Whether or not the material involves any aspect of sex is of no
consequence.

As for "child pornography", I am certainly not an advocate of the
distibrution of such material even if I can't define it!!  The issue is
can anybody define it without inadvertantly sweeping up any innocent
with the guilty. 

Regards,


-- 
John Ohrt *** Toronto, ON, Canada *** mailto:johrt@xxxxxxxx


------------------------------