Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D You're right Peter
- From: John Toeppen <toeppen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D You're right Peter
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 19:49:50 -0700
You're right Peter.
ViewMaster did it for me as a kid too. I never even saw a Realist until
I lived near Milwaukee in the early '80s.
If properly done the Kodachrome of the time could resolve almost 50
lp/mm over a 13mm height VM frame - an impressive
1300 lines with some granularity. The Realist fares better at some 2600
lines vertical. Well, thats more than 25+M of image
at 30 bits deep.
ViewMaster images did carry the torch for 3D for many years. It was and
is fun, affordable, and educational.
The images were great - but they are way down at the end of a dark
tunnel. It has been difficult to produce a low cost
large aperture short focal lenght lens for this format. Then too, your
nose would be to close to the reel, unless you used a
pair (plossel design)of lenses. A viewer could be modified to provide a
larger apparent image size. Do people do this? I would think
that it would be worth doing.
Better yet it would be nice if the old reels could be reissued in JPS
format on a CD. That way a treasure of old images could be accessed.
While JPS is the same resolution as your monitor (kind of) the field
angle can be 30+ degrees. Only modest image compression is required
when the images are on CD. Hundreds of reels could fit on a CD.
The Realist format is wonderful. This is the most practical way to
produce 3D photos with a hand held camera. Even the Kodaks took
great photos. It is the best way to record even the finest details in
color and light. A $150 camera in 1954 was expensive. The Kodak was
$89. Few could afford to take their own stereo photos. And not
everyone could view them at one time. So, you would have two viewers.
The Realist Projector sold for $550.
Computers are an affordable necessity these days. Fifty bucks more buys
glasses from VRex. These are wireless and have not been hard to use.
The mux software is $30 more to do your own images on your PC from your
scanned pairs.
John Toeppen
http://home.pacbell.net/toeppen/
------------------------------
End of PHOTO-3D Digest 2819
***************************
|