Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: Photography vs Stereography


  • From: Bob Wier <wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Re: Photography vs Stereography
  • Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1998 15:07:31 -0600

>expectation has been raised without being completely satisfied.  To
>see an apparently real scene, but frozen in space and time can be
>actually unnerving - more so than in a 2D shot where "the willing
>suspension of disbelief" is more an accustomed part of the experience.

It's funny, because looking at this sort of scene in "standard" stereo
formats doesn't affect me much - whereas the "Gap" dolly motion effect
was quite pronouced for me! Now, that looked *strange*. Which is why
it was used in ads, I suppose. Of course, being "programmed" to see
3D easily, it also was quite a jolt to be watching a "flat" ad, and
suddenly seeing it jump from 2D to 3D, unexpectedly. Almost a Star Wars
"jump to lightspeed" effect in some respects!


>space.  Our local theatre always leads off with a helicopter ride over
>Milwaukee.  If I sit forward on my chair, lean into turns, scan up and

It's been quite a few years since I've been in an IMAX theater, but
my first experience with one in Fort Worth had the same lead - except
in this case it was a flyover of Fort Worth. Even though not in
stereo, it came close to making me nauseous, and I'm not normally subject
to that. I suspect it was because of the slight up/down jitter of the camera
attached to the 'copter, or perhaps the stroboscopic effects from the
overhead blades...

THANKS

--Bob Wier


--- Bob Wier

  --- wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
     Rocky Mountain College
         Billings, MT
( currently in Ouray, Colorado)


------------------------------