P3D Re: Experience vs Novice? My 2 cent worth.

[LesTer <LNgFotoMan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>George Themelis wrote: I hate to generalize (yeah, sure!) but my
>experience indicates that the more a person is involved with flat
>photography, the less likely it is that he/she will be impressed with
>stereo photography.  There are exceptions, of course.... Also, the best

>candidate for conversion to stereo is an enthusiastic amateur who has
>just gotten into photography and is still disappointed by the failure
of
>2d photography to convey the beauty of a place as experienced in-situ
>with bare eyes.<<<

I guess there are more exceptions, out there then George thinks there
are.
I am for sure is one, I took my first picture, when I was 6 years old,
and that is 44 years ago,  went to photography school, work as a
professional for 12 years, and since then, been doing fine art
photography, with 12x20 format cameras, went into computer images and
then discover 3d stereo, on the net, about 4 months ago. Now I shoot
both in 3d stereo and 2d in my fine art photos. I  really do enjoy doing
the 3d stereo, in so much that I do it in both 35mm and 2 1/4 film. I
have a web site, but, if you are not into nude images, do not go to it.
http://smokinhog.com/3dmain.htm

LesTer


------------------------------