P3D Re: The $100 is still not claimed (was: Instant Anaglyphs)

[roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John W Roberts)]

>Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 03:11:46 -0600
>From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: P3D The $100 is still not claimed (was: Instant Anaglyphs)

>>So, Tom Deering, it looks like you have to pay up.  How about donating the
>>$100 to the National Stereoscopic Association?  If you like I will email
>>you a scan of Land's full color image made from the two filters.

Isn't 3D interesting enough that we can debate it without a need for
major financial stimulus?  :-)

>Just as a hedge against topic drift, let's recall our subject:

>1. Someone suggested an instant anaglyph camera, with complimentary filters
>over each lens.
>2. Among other problems, I pointed out this would produce color
>seperations, not anaglyphs.
>3. Someone claimed this setup would make a "full color" anaglyph.
>4. I stated that full color could not be achieved using this method.
>5. To prove my point, I offered $100 for an example.

Exactly what is a "full color anaglyph" anyway? If it's not precisely defined,
there's not much point in making the challenge.

John R


------------------------------