Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Mounting details for RBT mounts
- From: Paul Talbot <ptww@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Mounting details for RBT mounts
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 01:32:09 -0700
Ralph Johnston wrote:
> I just finished mounting 3 rolls of RBT X-4B slides (full frame 8
> perf). Here is a detailed description [snip] Cut off 8 frames from
> the strip with sissors and insert into the left side of a Hama 1225
> lighted film cutter.
This approach of course does not work with Realist-format slides,
due to the interleaving of the L-R images (Colardeau progression).
When I mount stereo slides, I much prefer a batch-mode opeartion.
I don't want to cut a few chips, mount a few pairs, cut a few more
chips, mount a few more pairs, etc. I much prefer to cut all the
film before putting any of the chips in the mounts. If I have more
than 1 roll to mount, I'd rather cut all the rolls before starting
to mount any of the chips.
There are several reasons I find the batch approach better. One, I
do not have enough working space to set up a film cutting area and
a mounting area at the same time. Two, I don't like the idea of
leaving a roll of film dangling from the cutter while I work on
mounting a few pairs. Also, it takes some doing to get a roll of
slides properly flat for mounting. Once they are flat they are
more difficult to store. If I have more than an evening's worth
of mounting to do, I would have to either roll the film again or
find a way to store it flat. Perhaps most importantly, each step
of the mouting process takes some time to get a rhythm going to
work quickly at it. Thus it seems more efficient overall to cut,
cut, cut, and then work on the mounting later. For example this
weekend I decided to start chipping away at my backlog of 12-15
rolls of slides. I'm not even in the same league as DrT at
mounting speed, so I know it is going to take a large amount of
time to complete the process.
To help with the batch mode operation, I tried something new.
See the next message for details.
Paul Talbot
------------------------------
|