Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D test results
- From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D test results
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 11:53:55 -0400 (EDT)
First off, I know nothing about camera testing. I'll admit I may have
blundered.
Summary: I shot a roll of test photos with three stereo, and I can't see
any difference. Is the problem my technique, or do these cameras all just
happen to be similar?
I took the three cameras to the roof, and put them on a tripod. I took a
meter reading, and figured out the correct aperture for each speed. I shot
the same aperture/exposure sequence on each camera. The focus was at
infinity, and the subjects were from 200ft to the horizon. I used the same
roll of film.
Under a loupe, they look identical. When I put the film under a low-power
microscope, I can't see any difference, either. The edges seem just as
crisp, the saturation is about the same. There are no details in one that
are not in another.
What am I missing? I thought there would be a big difference between
different models, but I don't see it. Any suggestions for a better test?
Right now I am shooting new test shots at ten feet. I have generated a
target with graduated fine lines. I am using a flash. I'm thinking this
might be a better real-world test for the kind of shots I usually make.
Ideas?
Tom
------------------------------
|