P3D Optimum, again!

["Andrea Blair" <asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>Mike K. wrote: It has been "established" that the 1.2 mm spec is an 
"optimum" based on projection in the SWAG formulation of that number.  
Is this same number "optimum" for use for hand-viewer-only use?  If not, 
what number would be the hand-viewer-only equivalent of the 1.2mm 
projection number?<<<<

>>>>George A. Themelis wrote: Please Mike, don't confuse the issue 
again. :-)  1.2 mm is not "optimum". It is maximum!!!  And as Boris 
posted earlier, it can easily be ignored under certain circumstances 
(meaning going even higher). What would the *maximum* be in a viewer? 
Depends on your eyes, I guess. There is no established standard and 
there should not be any IMO.<<<<

I'm confused - If 1.2 mm is the *maximum*, that should mean you cannot, 
under any circumstances, at all, ever go higher, right? Then George goes 
on to say (quoting Boris) that it can easily be ignored under certain 
circumstances, and you can go even higher. Huh? This certainly sounds 
like 1.2 mm is a highly recommended *optimum*, but not the absolute. 
Does "easily ignored" mean "incorrectly ignored", i.e. WRONG?

Confused in Linden.

Andrea S. Blair
asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


------------------------------