Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Realist a P&S?
- From: "Andrea Blair" <asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Realist a P&S?
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 10:35:09 PDT
>>>>Andrea Blair wrote: BTW, hyperfocal distance is commonly used in
"flat" photography. This is where I learned of the term and put it into
practice. I have never (until now) heard of a stereo photographer refer
to it.<<<<
>>>>Gabriel Jacob wrote: Of course hyperfocal distance is used in "flat"
photography, but it is standard practice for stereographers to maximize
depth of field, unlike in "flat" photography where this is not the
norm.<<<<
Says who? Why do you feel 2-D photographers do not practice maximizing
the depth of field? I can understand the first part of your statement on
stereo (I try to maximize depth myself in stereo, but I also do it in
2-D, as do many other people I know), but not the reference to 2-D
photographers. I know selective focus is used in 2-D, but I assume this
is also used in stereo sometimes?
I think we are starting to discuss several types of images at once,
again. Perhaps in a scenic, depth should *always* be maximized, but when
you want to isolate a flower, selective focus is much better (3-D or
2-D). Each situation should be considered on it's own. I don't think we
can make a *rule* of DOF.
Andrea S. Blair
asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
|