Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: RBT spacing
- From: "Greg Wageman" <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: RBT spacing
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 21:15:50 -0700
From: Rob <lilindn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Does this mean that it produces paired 24x36 images which can be
>mounted as regular slides and viewed in 2x2x2 viewers, or printed in
>minilabs?
Yes! Photo labs cannot distinguish the "B" model's images from any
other 35mm cameras.
>> (18 prs. per 36 exp. roll and 12 per 24 exp. roll)! i only
>> occasionally notice the images being slightly hyper!!
>
> True, this would only be about a 20% exaggeration, probably only
>noticable in portraits or close-ups.
I have Tokina 35-70mm zooms on my X2B. The added stereobase allows for
slightly more depth than a "normal" stereobase would, even when shooting
at the 70mm "extreme". Of course it doesn't totally compensate, and I
do notice the z-axis squash in those pictures. (I can hear the
orthoholics like John B. and Boris cringing in horror.) Nevertheless, I
wouldn't want to give up the flexibility that the zooms give me. A
picture I might have had to give up on with a fixed 35mm focal length
Realist-type camera might still be viable, such as when closer access is
denied by barriers, fences, police lines, etc. Given the option, I'd
prefer to move closer.
Note also that I can see through both viewfinders simultaneously, so I
don't find the 75mm interaxial to be greatly "abnormal", since it's so
close to my normal vision anyway.
-Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)
------------------------------
|