P3D Just kidding

["Sokolowski, Ray" <paa5402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> ----------
> From:
> photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[SMTP:photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Reply To:     photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent:         Tuesday, September 15, 1998 6:14 PM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:      PHOTO-3D digest 2976
> 
> 
> 
> : So now anyone who likes the Realist is 
> compared to someone with the brain of a nine year old girl. As are 
> anybody who enjoys crossword puzzles and cryptograms. 
> 
> Andrea Blair wrote:
> 
> Quick, boys (and girls), there's another sorry attempt at humor. Go
> git 
> 'em. Sic 'em! Stomp 'em! Make sure we embarrass them enough to never, 
> never again make another quick quip.
> 
> I interpreted it as an example that some people enjoy challenges, and
> that 
> the Realist is somewhat of a challenge. choose not to - it doesn't
> interest us ({;>)
> 
>       Yeah, I knew that was what he meant. It was just that his snide
> remark about his little sister losing interest in crossword puzzles at
> about the age of 9 WAS TOO MUCH! But my remarks were also meant in the
> spirit of fun. Can't I be ironic too? I guess my serious remarks about
> moving up to a Realist made it sound like I really was peeved. But I'm
> not, really. Much.{:>o  
> 
> p.s. Why is the Realist *better* than a Kodak (or other stereo
> camera). 
> Are the pictures sharper or something? I've never noticed any 
> difference.
> 
> I don't know, I've never used a Kodak. Or seen one. It was a remark
> made by one of the discussion leaders on Sunday afternoon at the
> convention. Sounded like he meant the Realist took sharper pictures.
> Had a ponytail and beard, I think. Many at the convention had
> ponytails, or beards, or both.
> 
> 


------------------------------