Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Film redesign
- From: michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)
- Subject: P3D Re: Film redesign
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 22:13:46 -0700
> Pac Bell is installing a brand-new Lucent 5ESS switch on my exchange
> next month. I'm willing to bet you that there are a significant number
> of lines of code in that switch devoted to handing pulse dialing, and
> that those lines of code were not written, debugged and tested for free,
> or even "next to nothing". It isn't just a matter of "leaving"
> something existing in place. And this cost accumulates with each new
> generation of equipment that is developed.
The pulse dialing decoding is probably done in the line card at the
remote whatcha-ma-call-its that probably has a T1-link back to the switch.
The switch probably never sees the twisted pair nor sees the pulse
dialing portion. A line card should do the grungy stuff like that
(as well as the DTMF detection which is a lot more complicated than
pulse dialing). The switch's processor isn't going to do the pulse
decoding unless the designers were really weird. IMO anyway. :-)
As to the code, it was debugged fifty years ago and can be redone
from scratch with a 1-bit microprocessor developed by most any
grade school student nowdays. :-)
> Technical improvement without unnecessary obsolescence is the name of
> the game.
But isn't the decision make of what "unnecessary" means usually
economic?
It's an old axiom, but true, that to know why things happen, "follow
the money".
>
> >If the people who buy their goods don't think it's an improvement, then
> >why do they stop buying the old stuff and buy the new? If nobody
> bought
> >APS and everybody bought 35mm, does one think that they'll phase out
> 35mm
> >and continue APS?
>
>
> Many don't see any difference because they never have enlargements made.
> For those consumers, APS is perfectly OK, until Kodak invents the "next
> new thing" and discontinues it. Kodak is discontinuing their
> finest-grained, sharpest, most vibrant color print film. Who knows what
> they'll kill next and for what hare-brained reason?
Exactly, and all those hundreds of millions of people who don't
care about the negatives and like the positives -- they wonder what
the other ten million are complaining about. :-)
Mike K.
>
> -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
|