Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: high contrast
- From: CanterMike@xxxxxxx
- Subject: P3D Re: high contrast
- Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 00:58:45 EDT
In a message dated 98-10-02 16:27:36 EDT, Cghon writes:
<< I use Kodak's
Royal Gold 200 for sunny scenes, usually at 1/100 @ f16 which is one
shutter speed stop less than "sunny 16s" which I think is actually the
exposure for beach or snowscenes. The negatives are quite thin, with
little or no detail in the shadow areas, and the prints are OK in the
sunny areas but almost totally black in the shadows. Same film
and same exposure in my Maxxum, with absolutely perfect results
and good detail in highlight and shadow areas. Is it the Realist or
perhaps the lab? >>
You've already answered some of this. If its the *same* film processed by the
*same* lab at the *same time* it must be the camera. I'd bet your shutter is
to fast or your, more rarely, the aperture scale is wrong. The "sunny 16"
regular full sun (not sand or snow) exposure for this film would be 1/200 sec
@ f16. (Sand & snow should be one stop less.) You are already overexposing
by 1 stop. If your negs are thin at one stop over then try two stops over, or
more. It may be useful to try some exposure tests on a slide film as the
narrower lattitude will help reveal minor errors. I would not be surprised if
the amount of error changes with each marked speed. Its quite common to
underexpose at one speed and overexpose at another.
A professional examination (with a proper tester) would tell all.
Good luck.
M
------------------------------
|