P3D Re: The 3-DVG Effect

[abram klooswyk <abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx>]

Ken Dunkley wrote (27 Oct 1998, PHOTO-3D Digest 3045):
>Abram Klooswyk,  still fuming from our 1995 meeting in Atlanta, 
>chimed in with his sharpened comments.
>Abram calls me a magician because even before trying the glasses, he
>challenged me, that they could not possibly work.  After viewing 
>ordinary magazine pictures he refused to say what he had experienced 
>and I remember verbally picking on him until he acknowledged that he 
>had, indeed, perceived the flat magazine picture in "3-D."   
>I guess his comments are his way of getting back at me. I actually 
>believe he feels I hypnotized him that day.

I'm afraid I cannot remember these events, Ken probably confuses me
with someone else. (Unless I *was* hypnotised :-)). I have only observed
how he demonstrated his devices to some persons, and my admiration for 
an amusing presentation should not be seen as "getting back". 
"Still fuming" is also an amusing expression, but I don't feel adressed.

My comment on this "3-DVG Effect" has to do with the fact that,
if a specific illusionary effect exists, at least percepted by some,
then I should like to know more about the nature of it. 
I am *not* very interested in more witnesses, or more demonstrations, 
but in more understanding of the effect.
I should like to hear theories, with suggested experiments to prove or 
disprove them. The chromostereopsis effect and the "Leonardo effect" 
(not an accepted name for it) could be an explanation, as Jim Crowell's 
post says. 

>I wish to send complimentary 3-DVG initiation model units ...
I gladly accept Ken's offer, and will comment if I get any new ideas.

Abram Klooswyk


------------------------------