P3D Re: Top quality of Barrier Technology could beat the best quality of 2 D photos

["ZEXIAN SHEN" <z.shen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-Bob Maxey wrote:
>There are also other technologies out there that beat all Lenticular
>technology images hands down. Consider the Stereo Jet type of image for
>example. I think the key to successful commercialization of Stereo display
>Images is top quality and better technology.
>
>I agree what you wrote.
>The quality of the barrier technology beats not only all lenticular ones
but also beats the best quality of 2 D photos, especially in still- life
objects. This is admitted by Mr. Duggal who is the owner of the biggest
professional photo-lab in the U.S.A. and has experiences for over 35 years
of 2 D professional photos. His company produces the best quality of 2 D
professional photos in the U.S.A. Many professional photographers know his
company.

you could image that if the photo quality of barrier technology is the same
as, even better than the best of 2 D's(very natural as 2 D but not of magic
illusions and cause headache as the old stereographs), but its outstanding
and depth 3rd dimension is what 2 D photos can never reach, how about its
commercialization?

We wish our 3 D fans had confidences regarding 3 D photos and participated
in the promotional activities. New products have probably weaknesses at the
begining, but they might present a new trend and beat old one, such as
Microsoft and Intel beat IBM.

Jason Shen


------------------------------