P3D Re: 2 D negative to 3 D ones

[ZEXIAN SHEN <Z.SHEN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Response to: Owen Pearn, Tony Alderson

Thank you very much for your information! If the problems are solved, we
could solve some limitations for our barrier technology.

Our barrier technology could be complementary with lenticular. Our
technology is good at big sizes of commercial photos which are backlit,
which could be shown in airports, theaters, shopping malls/ chain
stores, subways, bus/train stations, main streets,etc. Lenticular is
good at small sizes of life photos, such as family photos and postcards.
Our parameters could match some of lenticular ones, such as ITI( Image
Technology Inc.) at Atlanta. If you could process A single  2 D
negative/transparency into sequential negatives for lenticular, you
could do this for us, though some parameters have to be matched before
processed.

If you could, we could process any negative with changing background,
editing objects(add or delete somethings) and painting color, etc. 

However, there is not any 2 D photos which could be suitable to 3 D, for
example, if two objects in 2 D photos, first one is clear, the focal
length is on, second one which is quite far away from the first one is
not clear because the focal length is not right, this kind is not
probably suitable to process 3 D. Could you solve the problem for making
the second one clearer?

Thank you!

Jason Shen


------------------------------