Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D OLYMPUS XA and XA2 STEREO TWIN RIGS
- From: "Ray Moxom" <raymoxom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D OLYMPUS XA and XA2 STEREO TWIN RIGS
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 22:31:32 PST
OLYMPUS XA and XA2 STEREO TWIN RIGS
************************************
In PHOTO-3D Digest 3121 Gary Schacker < fotoschack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
************************************************
P3D Credit Where It's Due Message-ID:
<13741-3679A241-822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Many of you may know Joel Alpers of "Rocky Mountain Memories".
One of the many fine products and services he offers is the twinned
OlympusXA-2 rig. Now there's two ways in which you can get one of these.
You can buy it ready made from Joel, or you can supply the cameras and
he'll twin them for you. Both at very reasonable prices. I chose to go
the latter route. When using auto exposure cameras for stereo, there is
always the possibility that the exposures chosen by the cameras will not
match.
Being aware of this, I was careful to at least listen to my two examples
to be reasonably confident that they were choosing similar shutter
speeds under various lighting conditions. I sent them off to Joel who
did a very neat job on them and also supplied a high quality custom bar
for them to sit on. Much to my chagrin, the first two test rolls were at
least two stops different from each other! The cameras were indeed
choosing similar speeds, it was the apertures that were different! Joel
assured me that this was a rarity.
Usually if they sound the same they are the same, or close to it. So why
am a telling you all this? Because even though this was really my screw
up, Joel was kind enough to take them back, open them up, adjust and
test them until they were a good match. I'm sure it took plenty of time.
He even sent back test shots so I could see how close the exposures are.
All at no extra charge. When you do business with Joel, Dr. T, and
others on this list you often get more than you expect (or deserve).
Gary Schacker
*******************************************
MY COMMENTS ON THIS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
***********************************
When using slide film, there would seem to be a fundamental problem in
coupling two cameras and allowing each camera to use its own automatic
exposure control particularly if the slides are to be used for
projection. A one half stop exposure difference between left and right
images can be very disturbing to the audience.
With two automatic cameras displaced by at least 100 mm (4 inches) there
is a good chance that even a perfectly matched pair of cameras will give
slightly different readings. For example, a shadow can fall on one lens
and not the other or there can be a brighter area within the exposure
meterís field of one camera when compared with the other.
In my opinion, a far better approach is to use a pair of Olympus XAs,
rather than XA2s and have them connected such that one camera becomes
the master and the other the slave. That is use the exposure control on
one camera to control both cameras. This is the approach that has been
taken with considerable success by stereo workers in The Netherlands,
Switzerland and Australia. It requires a 4 wire connection between the
two cameras to parallel the two shutter solenoids. The battery is
removed from the slave camera. One battery is sufficient to fire both
sets of shutters.
When Nancy (wife) and I went to the ISU Congress at Rolduc last year we
left my RBT X2 at home and used the XA twin rig with a Belplasca as a
back-up. (I like the RBT but it is a bit big for a travel camera). One
of Nancyís XAs slides from that trip was the 1998 Sydney Stereo Camera
Club Slide of the Year.
Our XAs were twinned by a fellow member of the Sydney club who is a long
standing member of PHOTO-3D.
To the best of my knowledge this type of conversion can only be carried
out on the XAs - the ones with f2.8 lenses and aperture preferred
automatic exposure control. At any rate control of depth of field via
the aperture is essential in serious 3-D photography and this is not
possible with the XA2s.
As a light weight stereo camera with high quality lenses and "spot on"
automatic exposure control, this pocket sized (for large pockets) twin
rig is an absolute gem to use and has my vote as the best value stereo
camera(s) available today.
Does everyone agree with this last comment? " The XA twin rig, in
master-slave configuration, is the best value stereo camera available
today!!"
Ray
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------
|