Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D RE: Stereopticon vs. stereoscope
- From: Stephen Puckett <spuckett@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D RE: Stereopticon vs. stereoscope
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 18:28:44 -0800
I have a reprint before me of the 1902 catalog of that esteemed
purveyor of modern civilized taste: Sears, Roebuck, and Co. They
offer at least 1 'stereopticon' which is described in various
setups and kits. The descriptions include 2 illustrations. "The
Enterprise stereopticon is the highest grade of lantern made." The
description says that it "projects a clear and Brilliant Picture 10
feet square'. All descriptions are of single-lensed projectors.
There seems to be no reference to the 'stereo-' part of the
'stereopticon'. There was no discussion of fading or dissolving
capabilities. They also sell many sets of 'stereopticon slides'
or 'stereopticon views' which all appear to be rectangular.
On another page are offered several 'juvenile magic lanterns'. The
slides seem all to be round. You order slide sets by diameter to
match your magic lantern. The largest projected picture is 5 feet.
On yet another page are offered 'stereoscopes' which appear to be
the Holmes type. The most expensive, "...in fact, the best
Stereoscope made.", is priced at $1.87. Also offered are many sets
of 'stereoscopic views' for the stereoscopes - these are prices at
$0.36 to $0.95 per dozen.
In summary, the 1902 Sears did not confuse stereopticon with
stereoscope. Perhaps by this year, Sears considered a
'stereopticon' to be any kind of large magic lantern.
------------------------------
|