Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Elite Chrome vs Elite II
- From: "David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Elite Chrome vs Elite II
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 12:03:31 -0700
I finally got to try out some Kodak Select Elite Chrome 100 ASA
film. I have been shooting Kodak Ektachrome Elite II 100 ASA
since it came out. (I get it at Costco for $18.00 for 5 rolls - my local
store still hasn't changed over to Elite Chrome).
I was shooting scenes of a hot springs, river, and ice formations in
a steep-sided canyon in mid to late afternoon with overcast skies
and snow covering everything. I shot both films, although not
necessarily of the same exact scenes.
I shot these on Sunday, had them developed on Monday, and
mounted up on Monday night. I found two things that were quite
different and was wondering if anyone else has insight on this.
First, the Elite Chrome has a significant bow in the film strip as
compared to the Elite II. Not a curl from end to end, but a bow from
top to bottom. My processor uses dip and dunk and never rolls the
film except for a single time in the center of the strip. They claimed
it was probably a humidity thing, but both films were handled in
exactly the same manner from start to finish. Could the base be
different?
Second, the Elite Chrome has a much colder look than the warm
Elite II. This translates to a very blue color in the Elite Chrome and
more red and yellow in the Elite II. The most evident was in a slightly
under exposed shot down the river where the snow covered banks
took on a noticable blue cast. Most of the close-up shots of the ice
covered rocks were a lot less noticable. If I didn't know better I
would say that someone slipped a roll of Fuji Sensia in the Elite
Chrome box.
Was the Elite Chome formulated to be a colder film than the Elite II
or is it more a factor of underexposure on a cloudy winter day?
Unfortunately I don't have identical shots using both films at the
same exposure, so I can't compare directly. I was just wondering if
anyone could shed some light on this.
That's all for now,
David W. Kesner
Boise, Idaho, USA
drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|