P3D Re: Good Old Henry

[michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)]

> >Most of the objections you mentioned are aspects of stereography
> >implementations (like using Fuji film).  But good Old Henry probably
> >was using and talking about black and white images, so I think
> >interpretting his statement so literally (like having to be EXACTLY
> >as nature provides) is being excessively harsh on the guy.
> 
> I can only comment on stereographic systems that have been implemented.
> I think that's reasonable, don't you?

Not when talking conceptually, else it'd be like
saying that software is a pile of junk because everything Microsoft
writes is a pile of junk.  It's only those implementations that are junk.

> >I don't recall him using the word "perfect".
> 
> Don't take my word for it, go back to the original quote.  It's in the
> title.

I don't have it handy, and I really didn't look at the title, 
just the body of the quote's text.  I'll take your word for it
however.

Mike K.


> 
>      -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)
> 
> 
> 


P.S. - Some Microsoft software is pretty good, uSoft just seemed like
       a handy company to thrash.  :-)



------------------------------