P3D Re: I Need Help, Please!

[fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dr. George A. Themelis)]

Hi Doc!  We are here to help!

>My opinion leans toward Holmes style reproductions viewable using 
>plastic lens loupes 

We need to clarify this... "Holmes" implies a larger size (3.5 x 7 inch?)
that requires wedge shaped lenses.  I suspect you mean side-by-side
prints, maybe 50 mm wide (each one) so that the infinity separation
is around 60 mm.  These prints can be easily freeviewed and they do
not require wedge lenses.  There are several examples of this around.
The better ones have a foldout cardboard viewer.  The prints (both 
images in one piece of paper) sit inside the viewer so they are aligned 
and easy to view.

Other options include:  Anaglyph prints, lentincular prints, slides in
foldout viewers and View Master reels.

>To accomplish this promotion, a new 3D camera will be purchased.  

Great!  And you get to play with it?  If you want a new (currently
produced and supported) camera then you don't have many choices.
The letter R, B and T come to mind.  The RBT S1 appears to meet the
requirements of full frame pairs, easy to carry and operate.  Does
not draw much attention.  Autoexposure *and* autofocus.  Perfect for
candit shots.  

George Themelis


------------------------------