P3D Re: RBT in Stereo Sound (was: Projector Autofocus)

[Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George,

With all due respect, you've become even more monotonic about the RBT then
you were about the Realist not so very long ago.  However, the Realist was
at least affordable for the vast majority of stereo enthusiasts.  Now, your
answer to everything seems to be "No problem ... just spend $3500 for an
RBT" (or, sometimes, "No problem ... just spend $500 for a Comby viewer."
I daren't even think what an RBT project costs.

I have great respect for you, and your knowledge of and devotion to stereo.
 But can you vary the tune a little bit?  You're getting to sound like the
people who, in response to any question or problem on a PC, reply with "Get
a Mac!"  Interesting advice, but completely useless for most of us.

-pd


At 06:06 AM 3/10/99 , you wrote:
>Tom Hubin asks if there are any autofocus stereo projectors....
>Here is our chance to combine two threads... stereo photography
>and stereo sound.
>
>Let's sing it boys and girls!
>
>Let's start at the very beginning... a very good place to start,
>when you read you begin with A-B-C, when you photograph you begin 
>with R-B-T... R, B, T... the first three letters just happen to be, 
>R, B, T...
>
>Come, I'll make it easier for you.... Listen...
>
>ARE, a name, we call ourselves,
>BEE, it flies all around,
>TEA, a drink with jam and bread,... tra-la-la-la-la...
>
>Now children, once you have these letters in your hands, you can
>take a million different stereo pictures... like this... click,
>click, click!
>
>:-) George Themelis, from "The Sound of 3D" (original version)

--------
                             Peter Davis
               Funny stuff at http://world.std.com/~pd
           Resources for children's writers & illustrators:
		  http://world.std.com/~pd/cwrl.html


------------------------------