Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Super 3d frustration
- From: Sid Herbage <sid@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Super 3d frustration
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:47:46 -0400
I thought again about this. If you mounted them in horizontal format
but staggered (i.e. on a little behind the other and moved horizontally
as far in as it will go) you would have a minimum separation of about
2-7/8" (not bad). In this configuration, the lens plane of one would be
about 1" behind the other. Would this matter for normal shots?
Incidentally does anyone know where I can get any kind of repair
information (service notes, in a book etc) for a Minox 35EL ? I have
one whose shutter is a bit intermittent.
(I also have a Minox GTE ... in perfect condition ... that I'd like to pair
with it, of which Lincoln's question reminded me.)
At 12:22 PM 8/21/99 -0600, Lincoln wrote:
>Does anyone know if the minox 35 mm cameras are hyper if you twin them?
> If so, what is the actual inches of seperation between the center of
>the lenses.
Sid replied:
>Mounted in horizontal format, you'd have a minimum separation of 3-7/8"
>Mounted in vertical format (base-to-base) you'd have a minimum of 2"
... sid (sid@xxxxxxxxxx)
... sid (sid@xxxxxxxxxx)
------------------------------
|