Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: Super 3d frustration


  • From: Sid Herbage <sid@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Re: Super 3d frustration
  • Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:47:46 -0400

I thought again about this. If you mounted them in horizontal format
but staggered (i.e. on a little behind the other and moved horizontally
as far in as it will go) you would have a minimum separation of about
2-7/8" (not bad). In this configuration, the lens plane  of one would be
about 1" behind the other. Would this matter for normal shots?

Incidentally does anyone know where I can get any kind of repair
information (service notes, in a book etc) for a Minox 35EL ? I have
one whose shutter is a bit intermittent.

(I also have a Minox GTE ... in perfect condition ... that I'd like to pair
with it, of which Lincoln's question reminded me.)


At 12:22 PM 8/21/99 -0600, Lincoln wrote:

>Does anyone know if the minox 35 mm cameras are hyper if you twin them?
>  If so, what is the actual inches of seperation between the center of
>the lenses.

Sid replied:

 >Mounted in horizontal format, you'd have a minimum separation of  3-7/8"
 >Mounted in vertical format (base-to-base) you'd have a minimum of 2"

... sid (sid@xxxxxxxxxx)



... sid (sid@xxxxxxxxxx)


------------------------------