Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Mechanical shutters
- From: "John Goodman" <jgood@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Mechanical shutters
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 12:56:39 -0600
> Did that happen to one Realist in particular or to most Realists?
> How many Realists did you check? The reason I am asking is that
> the Realist has a very good reputation for accurate shutter
> speeds. While I do not measure shutter speeds my exposures with
> Realists appear very accurate.
Here are the figures for the 3 Realists I tested (left shutter
only), simple averages of 6 or 12 separate measurements,
with some rounding up or down to avoid an excess of
"significant" figures. Treat them as reciprocals, i.e. 1/n.
Sorry for the decimal denominators in some cases. An
asterisk indicates that the measured speed had such a
wide variation (approx. 50%) that the "actual" speed was in
doubt. :-)
Set 7p 2.8 Custom
200 180 200 160
100 80* 180 40*
50 45 60 30*
25 23 22 10*
10 15 11 8
5 8 5 5
2 3 2 2
1 2 1.1 1.1
I tried to be especially careful about keeping the tester's
sensor in the same position, and setting the shutter ring
right on the marks. Unfortunately, the shutter setting ring
on most of my Realists has considerable play (left, right,
up and down) but I did the best I could. BTW, my first
Realist (a 3.5 bought on eBay and CLA'd by Dr. T.) is for
all intents spot on .and. reliable. I wouldn't have invistigated
the other ones if I hadn't seen common evidence of
exposure problems. In the end, shutter consistency is far
more important to me than the actual speeds; capricious
variation is worrisome.
JG
|