Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: Is bigger really better?


  • From: "Greg Wageman" <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Re: Is bigger really better?
  • Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 02:09:13 -0600


From: Dr. George A. Themelis <DrT-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


>Of course, this discussion is about stereo slides.  Print makers
>don't have to worry about issues like these...


George,

That depends on what the print makers are shooting.  They seem to use
everything from Nimslos on up.

On the (rare) occasion when I load print film into the RBT X2B, I get
back 3.5x5" prints.  Mounting these in ~3.5x3.5 aperture Q-vues means
cropping 1.5" from the horizontal axis of the frame.  This isn't as
difficult as it may sound, however; I've found that I like the
flexibility of choosing the final composition at mounting time.  I find
it helpful to include more "space" around the subject when shooting, and
then crop later, as opposed to framing as tightly as possible and
finding later that the composition was *too* tight, and then there is
nothing that can be done about it.

     -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)