Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: 55mm lenses on 35mm SLRs (PHOTO-3D digest 3673)
- From: bobh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: P3D Re: 55mm lenses on 35mm SLRs (PHOTO-3D digest 3673)
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:14:39 -0700
RE: Looking for 55mm lens for beamsplitter etc.
As one who has lived in photography for 60 years, it is interesting to
know WHY there is (was) a 55mm lens!
When the SLR was introduced, the 55mm focal length was the
shortest that would clear the moving mirror, so all cameras had
55mm or 58mm lenses. THERE were NO wide angle lenses for this
reason. In fact in Japan they sold many small RF or viewfinder
cameras with 35mm or 28mm fixed lenses to be a companion to
the SLR with no wide angle. The French firm Pierre Angineaux
developed a 'reversed telephoto' design they named "Retrofocus"
and made a "35mm wide angle for the Exakta", this was a lens with
the field of view of a 35mm but a long back focus that cleared the
mirror. Such lenses became known as retrofocus regardless of
make or trademark. Soon lens makers used this technique to make
50mm lens (which had been hewn in stone by Leica as the standard
for a 35mm camera normal lens..a bit long for the diagonal of the
negative measure of normal = 43mm). And later all kindw of wide
angles. BUT it is still true today that any lens shorter than 55mm for
an SLR is a 'retrofocus' design to some degree. (One exception,
the wide angle 38mm for the Canon Pellix which had no moving
mirror but a fixed pellicle beam splitter.) BobH
Bob Howard (bobh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
SEND NO PIX OR PROGRAMS TO LIGHTSIDE!!
Instead send those to:
robhoward@xxxxxxxxxxx or bobh626@xxxxxxxxxxx
|