Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Projection and mounting, terminology
- From: Bruce Springsteen <bsspringsteen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Projection and mounting, terminology
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 22:21:13 -0700
Abram Klooswyk wrote:
> In my opinion studying a stereoglossary before studying the
> technical papers would be better :-) The only problem is that
> no real authoritative glossary exists :-(.
Ah, we need a real authority to create a real authoritative glossary. The
first term we must define is "authority". :-) Of course, an authoritative
stereoglossary cannot exist if it does not emerge from and make reference
to an authoritative stereophilosophy! :-(
> 1. Separation
> I would recommend the term "separation" to indicate _all_ left
> to right distances of "items" in stereoscopy. This includes
> lens separation of stereocameras, camera separation in
> hyperstereo, separation of homologues on stereoslides and
> printed stereoviews, (also infinity-, far- and nearpoint
> separation), separation of image apertures in stereocameras,
> and of mask apertures of 41 x 101 masks, separation of viewer
> lenses and eventually projection lenses.
This is very good, and follows Ferwerda, and I vote "yes". Another way to
say it is: Separation refers to distance between a "left" item and its
corresponding "right" item.
> It is a good thing to have different terms for X-direction
> distances ("separation") and Z-direction distances ("distance"
> in a narrower sense).
Is there any need to reserve a term for Y-direction measurements?
"Elevation"? Maybe not.
> A lot of confusion is avoided by being able to use these
> different terms for different concepts.
Indeed! And the corollary of this is that much confusion is caused by
using a single term for many different things. Or many terms for the same
thing.
> 2. Deviation
> By strict definition this should be the difference between
> on slide infinity separation and any smaller on slide
> separation. In this way we get near point deviation and window
deviation,
> the latter being the difference between infinity separation
> and mask aperture separation.
Perhaps "absolute deviation" for deviation from infinity?. Is this a
linear measurement, or an angular one?
> Less strictly applied deviation
> could also mean the difference between far point separation
> and any smaller on slide separation, as in many scenes no
> infinity is included.
Perhaps "local deviation"? So "deviation" is the difference between any
horizontal measurement *within* a left item, and the corresponding
measurement in a right item. Expressible as an angular or a linear value.
> 3. Convergence
> In stereoscopy the term convergence applies to lines or
> directions, like lines of sight or optical axes. These lines
> or directions converge if they meet at a common point closer
> than infinity.
Always expressed aas an angle. Zero convergence is when the eyes fixate
on an object at infinity in reality. Positive values of convergence are
for fixating on a nearer object. Divergence would have a *negative*
convergence value?
Is there a good term for the direction of the deviation in a single stereo
image in a pair? This must be found before mounting a print, for
instance. I'm trying to think of a simple term for this.
Bruce
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
|