Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Digest Number 13
- From: "Dan Shelley" <dshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Digest Number 13
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 17:46:32 -0700
From: "Dan Shelley" <dshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
><< As best as I can tell, there is no universal agreement as to why
> the curved mount was adopted. Some think the reasons you mention,
> while it may be that the thought was that a curved mount made the
> image look more "3D" >>
>
>Actually, I think there may be a very paractical reason, illustrated in a
old
>stereo view posted not long ago (I think by Dan Shelley) of a Keystone
>production line. It showed stacks and stacks of view cards, all curled.
In
>my experience, with my flat cards, I can stack them only about 20 high
before
>they begin to slide, or at least become unstable. Curved cards are as
stable
>as lego blocks, no matter how high they are stacked. Could it be the curve
>is simply a matter of manufacturing expediency???
This is the picture Jim has made reference to: (at least I think it is...)
http://www.dddesign.com/3dbydan/apec/cards1.jpg
Here is another that also shows stack of views:
I have had it on my site to add to the APEC material there for quite some
time now... ;-)
Good theory Jim. I think it might be a combination of Thom's ideas and this
one as well.
Dan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates
as low as 0.0% Intro APR and no hidden fees.
Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/975/5/_/160438/_/953513217/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|