Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] " U.S. Views" Folio Debut 41X101
- From: Linda Nygren <lnygren@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] " U.S. Views" Folio Debut 41X101
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:37:53 -0500
markaren@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 2) subjects initially limited to home city sights, architecture,
> cityscapes, historic etc. The idea is to maintain the " US Views" theme.
> Perhaps a "sister" folio could be created in the future to offer topics
> of personal interest etc.
I am interested, but would like a clarification here. Views must be of
*ones own* home city/area? Just cities, or parks/rural areas etc? Is the
idea that the views should be somewhat geographically or architecturally
distinctive, potentially identifiable to a particular city or area?
To me the "US Views" title would conjure up some of the View-Master
scenic sets with national parks etc as well. But are we trying to avoid
everyone sending in views of the same tourist destinations, and
encourage folks to shoot locally rather than waiting for vacations?
I am fine with the "local" theme, but was just unsure about what exactly
you had in mind here.
> 3) administrators ( myself and perhaps Dr. T) must approve all images.
> Reasons for rejection cound be over/under exposure, other defects such
> as out of focus, blocked lens and perhaps redundancy if same image is
> being submitted over and over again. Images must meet criteria listed in
> the membership info.
Is redundancy really a problem if the images are going out to different
people?
-Linda
|