Re: [photo-3d] Sputnik vs. Realist

["don lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am getting a bit tired of hearing the never ending bit refering to M F and
SPUTNIK AS BEING ONE AND THE SAME THING . I HAVE SEEN FEW  Sputniks that are
useable even at f 22 by my standards though  at the present it is the only
game in town outside of making your own. Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Deering" <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Sputnik vs. Realist


> On 6/18/00, Dr. George A. Themelis wrote:
> >>A nice MF dual rig can
> >>be expensive and heavier than even a Realist.
> >
> >The Spuntik is heavier and occupies more than
> >two times the volume of a Realist :)
>
>
> Does anyone know a Ph.D. in Materials Science who can analyze this for me:
>
> Sputnik = 809 grams
> Realist = 820 grams
>
> Source: www.stereoscopy.com/cameras
>
> Tom Deering
>
> ---
> tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx    http://www.deering.org
>
>
>
>