Re: [photo-3d] Re : flat 3D

[Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

When CDs came out, there was a big fuss about labelling them DDD or ADD or 
AAD, where these letters referred to the whether the recording, mastering 
and final medium was analog or digital.  I think we could do something 
similar, to describe whether the original scene, the image capture, and the 
final format are 2D or 3D.  For example, a stereo projection of a Realist 
slide of a real scene would be 3-3-3.  However, a print from half of the 
same Realist pair might be 3-3-2.  Similarly, a stereo picture of a 
painting might be 2-3-3.

That should be enough to confuse everyone.

-pd


At 10:40 PM 06/18/2000, you wrote:
>Yes, you have understood what I wanted to say. I could also write "3D mono"
>in contrast with "3D stereo".
>
>Pierre Parreaux
>----------
> >
> > In a message dated 6/15/00 2:48:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > pierre.parreaux@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> >> we have the choice between to view it in "flat 3D" or in "3D stereo".
> >
> > To make sure that I am following your reasoning correctly, Pierre, by "flat
> > 3D" are you in reference to one 3D image on a computer screen as 
> opposed to a
> > double (stereoscopic) image that can be viewed cross-eyed, etc. for the
> > stereoscopic effect?
> >
> > Ken Villwock
>
>

--------
                                 Peter Davis
                  Funny stuff at http://www.pfdstudio.com
                  "The artwork formerly shown as prints."
              Boycott spammers and other intrusive advertisers!