Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Viewer Review - 2 - Viewing
- From: "Dr. George A. Themelis" <drt-3d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Viewer Review - 2 - Viewing
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:28:50 -0400
Continuing with the Ekeren 5XR review.
--- CHAPTER 2: VIEWING
As with most Ekeren viewers the viewing part is quite
simple. It consists of two lenses, a plastic box to
hold them, a slot for the slide and a plastic diffuser
in the back for "available light" illumination.
The lenses are fully-coated, 30mm in diameter. After
taking the front apart I knew (from their length and
optical quality) that they have to be double achromats
(two achromatic lenses per eyepiece). I confirmed with
Jacob that this is indeed the case. This is the same
design found in the deWijs viewers and IMO it is the
best available design in stereo viewers today.
The image shows no distortions or aberrations all the
way to the edge. Field of view and eye relief are both
very good. Even though the design is such that my
eyes cannot get very close to the lenses (I estimate
that they are about 1 inch away from the lenses) I am
still able to see the widest RBT stereo mount (33mm wide).
By pulling my eyes one inch further from the closest
viewing position (simulating "worse case" eye glass
wearers) I can still see 7p slides without any blockage.
The effective focal length of the lenses (which determines
the magnification) is 47mm and to my eyes it is the same
size as the Realist red button which has a reported 44mm FL.
That's plenty of magnification for me.
The lenses are joined together for ganged focusing via a
screw type mechanism. To my knowledge, this is the only
Ekeren viewer with ganged focusing (the rest have
individually-focusing eyepieces). In my opinion, ganged
focusing is a better design in terms of convenience and
ease of use. The length of travel for focusing is quite
long, which is nice for those who want to use the viewer
without their glasses on.
There is no interocular adjustment. In principle, this
adjustment is not needed if the lenses are large enough
and centered at the infinity (maximum) separation of the
stereo slide. However, as I am slowly discovering, if
the image is mounted so that the infinity separation is
larger than the maximum standard value then my eyes
cannot diverge to fuse the infinity points, resulting
in double images (other people have no problem with this).
I have the tendency to increase the interocular spacing
of the lenses (if an interocular adjustment is available),
resulting in viewing with a slight convergence. Either
by habit or "by design" this appears to be the most
comfortable setting for my eyes. When faced with a viewer
with no interocular adjustment, like this one, I just hope
that the lenses are properly centered, which is the case
here. Whenever I see a slide that gives me double images
at infinity then I know that it is mounted with too wide
of an infinity separation. That's a warning if this is
one of my images (especially dangerous in larger-screen
stereo projection) so there is an advantage in not having
interocular adjustment in a viewer (promotes good mounting
skills).
The slide slot is wide enough to accept the thickest
possible stereo slides. There is no retaining clip to
keep the slide flushed to one side. After viewing slides
mounted in all different mounts, I don't think this
function is necessary in this viewer.
Overall, nothing earth-shaking in this "optical part" of
the viewer, other than the superb optical quality and
convenient ganged focusing in a simple (almost
indestructible) lightweight housing.
To be continued....
George Themelis
|