Re: [photo-3d] projectors/2x2/R-format/stereo window

[Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"David W. Kesner" wrote:

> > I need to sit down and do the math for my particular
> > camera/viewer combo.
> 
> No need to do any math, the window placement has nothing to do
> with your handviewer. You cannot change the window in a
> handviewer like you can on a projector.

Quite right. Duh! I'm saying one thing and thinking something 
else.  One of those flat-forehead kind of things (where I hit
my forehead with my hand and say "of course!").  :-)

I'm talking more about homologous-point spacing and the
like in terms of eyestrain and ease of viewing the image,
not where the mount-defined edges are in relation to the
3D image at the center.  More ease of viewing rather
than window dressing.  :-)


> That could end up taking you about 16 hours or two hours a
> night for a week. Yes, a lot of time in some people's eyes.

Let's see... I get home at 8 p.m., say "hi!" to my wife for
one minute, then start mounting... hmmmmm.   One of the 
down sides of working for a startup...  I only got to go to
Hawaii to take the pic's because of my father's death.  :-(

Sigh... (with a silent repose..).

> With all that said, I still stand by my opinion that all
> images should be mounted to their best if you are going to be
> showing them to anyone but yourself.

I've pretty much always agreed with you there, at
least in general principle.  And absolutely positively
in terms of projection.

Mike K.