Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Provia !!
- From: Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Provia !!
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 22:37:00 -0700
"Hans A.J. Middendorp" wrote:
>
> Yes, Provia RDP II - 100 ASA for Stereo!
>
> I have used Provia for years and it is _very_ good under tropical
> conditions, i.e. f16-22, 1/200 mid-morning (dry season), but very 'hard'
> contrast, flickering reflections, 'washed out colours' etc.
>
> Occasionally, I had to switch to Kodak E6 film - Two years ago, the New
> York UV haze in September turned out bearable on Provia (then I ran out of
> film and Provia was not easily found in NY), but simply un-viewable on
> Kodak E6, unless you like magenta a lot. Also last year, I ran out of
> Provia while in Nepal. What happened: Kodak E6 had over-exagerated
> contrast, and everything not just a little greenish, but really green!! ...
>
> To be sure, all my films rest in my fridge before and after shooting, until
> developing in Holland. Price of a role of Provia is just less than 4 USD
> here in Bangladesh.
>
> Yes, I did try Sensia 200 as well, but I found it much more grainy compared
> to Provia 100 and not worth the extra f-stop. This seems to be in
> contradiction with the Table posted below, were the RMS value is only about
> 10% different between Provia and Sensia? How should one understand these
> values?
In an article somewhere on the net (when I was investigating RDP III),
I read that one unit in the RMS column meant double the visible
"grainyness". Not sure if that really is correct in terms of human
perception, but it does perhaps agree with your observation.
I also understand that a film can seem less or more grainy
than the numerical number. Provia F is said to be even less grainy
than it's low number due to the nature of it's structure (at the
cost of additional resolution it might have had otherwise).
Below is another chart (from http://creekin.net/films.htm) that includes
Kodak films. Enjoy...
Mike K.
slide films RMS resolutionº sharp latitude blue green red code
<
Fuji Provia F 100 8 60 140 15 -1/+1 3.5 3.4 3.3
RDP3
Fuji Velvia 50 9 80 160 25 -1/+1 3.8 3.7 3.4 RVP
Kodachrome 25 9 63 100 26 -1/+1 3.5 3.6 3.8 PKM
Kodachrome 64 10 63 100 16 -1/+1 3.4 3.5 3.7 PKR
Fuji Provia 100 10 60 140 11 -1/+1 3.6 3.4 3.3
RDP2
Fuji Astia 100 10 55 135 10 -1/+1 3.5 3.4 3.3 RAP
Ektachrome 100s 10 55? 125? 10 -1/+1 3.8 3.6 3.3
E100S
Ektachrome 100sw 10 55? 125? 10 -1/+1 3.8 3.6 3.3
E100SW
Agfa RSX 50 10 55 125 8 -1/+1 3.7 3.6 3.4
RSX2
Agfa CTprecisa100 10 50 130 7 -1/+1 3.4 3.9 3.5 CTp
Agfa RSX 100p 10 50 125 9 -1/+1 3.7 3.6 3.4
RSX2
Fuji MltiSpeed @200 11 55 135 10 -1/+1 3.2 3.4 3.0 RMS
Ektachrome 100vs 11 50 100 9 -1/+1 3.7 3.5 3.2
E100VS
Ektachrome 100+ 11 50 100 8 -1/+1 3.8 3.5 3.1 EPP
Ektachrome 100 11 50 100 7 -1/+1 3.7 3.4 3.1 EPN
Ektachrome 200 12 50 125 5 -1/+1 3.7 3.6 3.2
E200
Agfa CTprecisa200 12 50 120 8 -1/+1 3.2 3.5 3.3 CTp
Agfa RSX 200p 12 50 110 8 -1/+1 3.3 3.3 3.2
RSX2
Fuji MltiSpeed @400 13 55 135 10 -1/+1 2.9 3.2 2.7 RMS
Fuji Provia F 400 13 ? ? ? -1/+1 ? ? ?
RHP2
Fuji Provia 400 15 40 125 5 -1/+1 3.3 3.2 3.1 RHP
Kodachrome 200 16 50 100 16 -1/+1 3.1 3.2 3.5 PKL
Fuji Provia 1600 25 40 100 7 -1/+1 2.6 2.4 2.2 RSP
|