Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Survey Follow-up
- From: Ron Beck <rbeck@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Survey Follow-up
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 12:59:36 -0500
I too use "other than Kodachrome" for this reason (local processing &
quick turnaround). I found a lab I trust. They do a great job and take
care to get my developing right. They follow my instructions and take
pride in their work.
I shoot stereo with my Kodak Stereo camera and mount in heat seal mounts
using the tabs to align top and side. I do not mount for projection nor
do I submit my slides for competition. I just like to cronicle our
family life and have been well satisfied with the results I've achieved
to date.
I have also learned, from Dr. T's "what's wrong with these" survey that
I do have some additional learning to do and perhaps some work in
competition or some additional viewing in a competition environment
would help expand my knowledge of 3D. For now though, those
opportunities are not possible. So, I'll be happy with what I currently
know.
Regards,
Ron
Herbert C Maxey wrote:
>
> >>I use E6 because I want it processed locally in 2 hours (drop
> >>it off at morning break and pick it up at lunch). No lost film
> >>in the mail and no waiting for weeks to get it back. Also no
> >>rolling of the film strip as my lab returns it in an acetate
> >>sleeve straight from the drying rack.
>
> So I gather that getting the film back from the lab fast is more
> important than other factors? As for rolling the film, if you reverse
> roll it, it will be absolutely flat. All I am trying to do is get some
> general ideas as to why some prefer all the other stuff to Kodachrome.
>
> Bob
|