Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Re: Dale Labs
- From: Linda Nygren <lnygren@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: Dale Labs
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 08:02:19 -0500
Yes, this is one of those labs that offers prints and slides from
*their* (motion picture) film. But they will also make copy slides from
*any print film* (C-41), so one can shoot the print film of ones choice
and they will make the slide copy of the uncut negs or will do the
procesing for you also. Be sure to ask for unmounted slides, as with any
lab.
I do not know what specific film they use to make the slide copies, but
I know that they changed to a "new and improved" version a couple of
years ago that reportedly gives better results than what they used to
use. I notice they now also offer a variety of other services including
APS, 120, E-6 slide processing and digital.
Incidentally, the previous comments about high grain should probably be
clarified as to what print film was initially used before the slide copy
was made. My experience in the past for stereo slides was starting with
Kodak 100 speed print film, either Gold or Royal Gold. I didn't notice
the grain but thought the colors were somewhat blah at the time. In the
distant past I had tried "their" film and was not happy with it even for
2D. -Linda
Herbert C Maxey wrote:
>
> >>What about the other colors besides white? My past experience also was
> >>that the colors weren't very impressive, and I guess poor color
> >>saturation may sum it up. I may send some print film in to try it
> again,
> >>though, since it has been a while and they have changed their film
> since
> >>then.
>
> What specific film are we talking about here? The message says "they have
> changed their film..." Is this one of those combo print and slide films
> that have been offered for the past couple of decades or so? At one time
> it used to be motion picture film ends. Never a good option for film
> because it was not designed for still photography. Can someone tell me
> what film it is specifically?
>
> Bob
|