Re: [photo-3d] Re: pissing contest (was re re re re the fly)

["John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry about my rather strong response.  But, 3-D movies are pretty important
to me.  As the bumper sticker says: "I Love 3-D Movies".

Vectographs are pretty high on my list of interests.  They solve lots of
prolems, such as permitting the full film area (whatever format) to be
utilized, and preventing a theater from screwing up the projection (the
projectionist does not even have to know it is a 3-D movie, and it can be
spliced right into a flat film on the same platter).  The image can be
larger, because less light is lost than with split-area systems.  No special
projection lenses or optical devices (which can be misaligned) are required.
Etc.

Anyway, thank you for your comments.  All of you.  This exchange, including
differences of opinion, make this forum very interesting and valuable.

JR

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herbert C Maxey" <bmaxey1@xxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: pissing contest (was re re re re the fly)


> You are absolutely right. Discussing a renowned company's possible
> involvement with a full color Vectograph 3D MP Process has no place on a
> list devoted to 3D photography. Silly me, what are we thinking when we
> talk about 3D movies on a 3D list.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>