Re: [photo-3d] Vision Redux

[Rory Hinnen <Rory.Hinnen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Herbert C Maxey wrote:
> 
> I want to thank you very much, for saving me lots of money. With the
> money I will now save, I plan to purchase another motorcycle and take a
> long trip. I will now forget Kodachrome film, that most inferior of films
> and do all my photography using re-spooled motion picture film.

So, call me a fool, but what is the problem using movie film stock? If
other people are bored with this, I invite you to respond personally.

Little background, I work with movie film stock every day. I understand
it, and haven't really seen a problem using it for still work (half my
day is spent looking at stills from movie stock on a light box - okay, a
little hyperbole there, maybe a quarter). I'm personally planning on
using 5245 in my realist, not because I'm looking for a cheaper
solution, but I want more experience with that particular stock (it is
sort of my stock in trade, so to speak).

.r.