Re: [photo-3d] Re: pissing contest (was re re re re the fly)

["John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That was my first reaction too.  But then I realized that if someone else
gave some unsubstantiated information, I too would like to know the source.
It was my fault that I did not keep better track of the file on this.  I
will keep looking.

JR

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Beck" <rbeck@xxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: pissing contest (was re re re re the fly)


> No, reading one line responses were getting quite boring.  The review
> that John provided regarding his discussion with someone in China and
> again with someone associated with Technicolor was quite interesting and
> informative.
>
> Had this information been mentioned before, perhaps the "where'd this
> come from" and "who at Technicolor" comments would have been avoided and
> a more indepth discussion of the process and the possibilities of its
> use in 3D films would have taken place.
>
> To me, the whole discussion appeared to degrade into a "yeah, right,
> who'd you talk to" type of response to the original mention of
> vectorgraphs by Technicolor.  But, that's just my opinion.
>
> Ron
>
> Herbert C Maxey wrote:
> >
> > You are absolutely right. Discussing a renowned company's possible
> > involvement with a full color Vectograph 3D MP Process has no place on a
> > list devoted to 3D photography. Silly me, what are we thinking when we
> > talk about 3D movies on a 3D list.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
>
>