Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: [photo-3d] 3D movies why aren't there more?


  • From: "John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [photo-3d] 3D movies why aren't there more?
  • Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 18:56:35 -0700

In my previous post, I mentioned Chris Condon in relation to your 3-D
theater ideas.  In addition to stereoscopic projection (his theater had
interlocked dual projectors which also were unlocked for screening single
system 3-D), Chris is the designer and developer of the StereoVision camera
lens system.

JR

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herbert C Maxey" <bmaxey1@xxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] 3D movies why aren't there more?


> >>Since about 1967, StereoVision camera and projection stereoscopic
> lenses
> >>have been available which permit single camera and single projector
> >>acquisition and projection of true stereoscopic 3-D movies.
>
> Yes, and that system was covered extensively in the famous 3D issue of
> American Cinematographer. After reading it, I contacted the StereoVision
> for more information regarding their system, I was hoping to duplicate it
> experimentally. Daniel Symmes was gracious to speak with me about it and
> gave me some additional information about this type of single lens stereo
> photography.
>
> A similar system can be produced with a split filter at the film plane.
> All that is needed is a red and green gel filter fitted together with a
> small space between them. A Neutral Density  filter is also used to
> compensate for the different filter factors between the colored filter.
>
> Drawings of the system are also available in the Patent literature.
>
> INCIDENTALLY, I know that American Cinematographer  is publishing a book
> about stereo and someone you all know is writing it. I will not mention
> the name because it might generate e-mail that the author really does
> not. No, it is not me. Should be fascinating to read.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>