Re: [photo-3d] All it takes for 2d to 3d

[Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eddie Bowers wrote:
> 
> Not really. Take an example of a photo taken of a person 3/4 view where the
> other image that must be generated would include a glimpse of the persons
> ear that is not visible in the 2D picture. The computer has no information
> that the ear is even there or if it has an earring in it or whatever.
> I'm sure there better example others can come up with, but you get the idea.

So?  The computer automatically produces a person without an ear.  Now the
computer even is being an interpretive artist!  Even additional bonus points!

With tongue in cheek...

Mike K.