Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] Re: Yashica T4S


  • From: apetrov@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Yashica T4S
  • Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 05:33:59 -0000

Hi, John

I really appreciate your comments.

I strongly believe that by connecting two batteries in parallel you 
can decrease your chance of destroying electrical circuits in your 
cameras.  This is particularly truth for digital cameras.  Because 
difference in voltage potentials of two batteries over time, can 
create parasitic current between two cameras.

Plus, even thin wires can endure several amperes current for short 
time.

An equivalent battery capacity double if you connect two of them in 
parallel.

I actually glue my connectors outside cameras body.  You can find 
information about those connectors on Digi-Key web site 
(www.digikey.com) catalog numbers from H2152-ND to H2177-ND.

Best regards

Andrei

--- In photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gromit <gromit@xxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for posting those pictures.
> 
> Very slick looking connection.  Minimizes space used, and external 
> clutter.  With a short section of cable, it could be used in 
portrait 
> orrientation.  I like it.
> 
> I also like the master/slave setup and would enjoy trying that with 
my 
> digitals.  The problem I see is the common power.  I recall you 
saying that 
> you connected the batteries in parallel.  My digitals can draw an 
amp (or 
> more) so I'm not sure I could cram enough current through light 
guage wires 
> to allow for this.
> 
> One of the problems I have with the digital twin I'm working on is 
the 
> "density" of the cameras.  There is no extra space inside the case 
for any 
> connector intrusion.  It looks like some of the mini connector 
exists 
> inside the camera body.  How much?
> 
> John Thurston
> Juneau, Alaska