[photo-3d] Re: Shooting as a beginner as a LOL

["Peter Davis" <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

--- In photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx, "3dstereo.com" <ddd@xxxx> wrote:
>A Revere is easy for a
> beginner and somehow elegant to hold and shoot with; not so with the
> Realist.  I sincerely believe that if I had to "overcome" the Realist
> user-unfriendly camra, I would not be shooting in 3D today.
>
> So beginners should be aware that there are choices in vintage 3D
cameras
> and with that knowledge, perhaps more would get interested if the
learning
> curve were not so steep. And the word should be spread to these
beginners.

I know very little about the Revere, but I've been a Realist user for
over 6 years.  What are the differences?  How do the optics compare?
Does Revere have an equivalent of the Realist 2.8?

Thanks,

-pd