Re: [photo-3d] Re: [3D-Glamourphoto] A Profound Statement

[Danny Vint <dvint@xxxxxxxx>]

I've actually found that images I have taken as 2d because they were of
interest to me were actually too busy, but that same "business" is actually
an advantage in many of the 3d images I've taken. The 3d helps make sense
out of a picture that wouldn't work otherwise.

Similar to some wide landscapes that don't work with the Realist because
everything is too far away. I said Realist because I know you could improve
the situation with a wider "hyper" spacing.

..dan

At 10:40 PM 1/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Lincoln wrote:
>
>>>An image shouldn't
>>>be interesting just because it is 3-D.
>
>But some images do not work at all in 2d (because of their 3d nature), and
>these can be superb in 3d (because they are rarely seen or inadequately
>seen in 2d).
>
>Boris
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Boris Starosta, primary       boris@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Dynamic Symmetry, LLC                 http://www.starosta.com
>usa - 804 979 3930                    http://www.starosta.com/3dshowcase
>
>- Science is the part of culture that rubs against the world.
>-
>-                                     - Stanislaw Lem
>
>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny Vint
http://www.dvint.com

Author: "SGML at Work"  
http://www.slip.net/~dvint/pubs/sgmlatwork.shtml 
 mailto:dvint@xxxxxxx