Re: [photo-3d] Re: [3D-Glamourphoto] A Profound Statement

["John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For an excellent example of this, check out the cover illustration on the
December 2000 (Series 2 - Number 44) issue of "Stereoscopy".

JR

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Vint" <dvint@xxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: [3D-Glamourphoto] A Profound Statement


> I've actually found that images I have taken as 2d because they were of
> interest to me were actually too busy, but that same "business" is
actually
> an advantage in many of the 3d images I've taken. The 3d helps make sense
> out of a picture that wouldn't work otherwise.
>
> Similar to some wide landscapes that don't work with the Realist because
> everything is too far away. I said Realist because I know you could
improve
> the situation with a wider "hyper" spacing.
>
> ..dan
>
> At 10:40 PM 1/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >Lincoln wrote:
> >
> >>>An image shouldn't
> >>>be interesting just because it is 3-D.
> >
> >But some images do not work at all in 2d (because of their 3d nature),
and
> >these can be superb in 3d (because they are rarely seen or inadequately
> >seen in 2d).
> >
> >Boris
> >
> >________________________________________________________________________
> >Boris Starosta, primary       boris@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Dynamic Symmetry, LLC                 http://www.starosta.com
> >usa - 804 979 3930                    http://www.starosta.com/3dshowcase
> >
> >- Science is the part of culture that rubs against the world.
> >-
> >-                                     - Stanislaw Lem
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Danny Vint
> http://www.dvint.com
>
> Author: "SGML at Work"
> http://www.slip.net/~dvint/pubs/sgmlatwork.shtml
>  mailto:dvint@xxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>