Re: [photo-3d] Re: To math or not to math?

[Brian Reynolds <reynolds@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike Davis wrote:
> The article George referenced details the accuracy I permit myself
> with subjects like the hangared B17.
> 

I just wanted to point something out.  Mike is talking about a set of
pictures he took (which I have not had the pleasure to see) of one of
the last flying B-17's in existence.  The full article makes it plain
that he was given a level of access to this aircraft that only a
handful of people in the world will ever get.  The amount of care
taken to ensure that he walked away with 100% sucess was most
certainly warranted.

I would expect any professional photographer (and for all I know Mike
is a pro) in the same situation to take the same care.  The biggest
differences (besides not shooting in stereo) are that a pro would
likely have an assistant helping out and that the pro's high powered
calculator and programs would likely be in the form of an electronic
camera and metering system.

-- 
Brian Reynolds                  | "Dee Dee!  Don't touch that button!"
reynolds@xxxxxxxxx              | "Oooh!"
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds  |    -- Dexter and Dee Dee
NAR# 54438                      |       "Dexter's Laboratory"

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/