Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: [photo-3d] Re: Quiz: Movement of clouds/direction of shoot


  • From: "John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: Quiz: Movement of clouds/direction of shoot
  • Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:00:22 -0800


----- Original Message -----
From: <abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 8:01 PM
Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Quiz: Movement of clouds/direction of shoot

> Complications occur when close clouds overlap more distant hills or
> mountains. Apart from several spoiled shots I have seen (and made
> myself) some shots where clouds, partially overlapping mountains,
> moved closer in 3D. This can be nice, unless they become cut off by
> the window when they come too close, and unless they cast shadows on
> the mountains :-().
> But a few close clouds only in the middle of the scene can be nice.
>
> However, in many, maybe most cases non-background-overlapping clouds
> a little more distant than horizon mountains are fine.
>
> So I believe the answer to "which first" is not always the same.
> I look forward to other opinions, and to they only right answer:-).

A very good answer.  This is also a good example of the subjective nature of
stereoscopic imaging.  Which direction is better depends upon several
variables (including all or those mentioned above) specific to a particular
view at a particular time.  Either direction may be valid and can produce a
good (or a bad) image, depending upon those factors that existed when the
scene was photographed.  I have seen beautiful examples both ways.

JR


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/