Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] Re: Medium Format Viewer


  • From: "Alan Lewis" <3-d@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Medium Format Viewer
  • Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:21:11 -0600

Don wrote:
>Mr alan Lewis stated that viewer lenses are "the bigger in diameter the
>better " but my experience is to the contrary and that bigger is a cheap
>substitute for having control of the interocular spacing - pass  a 35 mm
>viewer around and watch the different viewers make interocular adjustments-
>when available which is a given with most 35 mm viewers. DON

Bigger lenses are more expensive than interoculuar adj., not a cheap alternative.
I use bigger lenses first for the field of view.
If a standard infinity spacing (mounting gauge) is followed when mounting slides there is no need for interocular lens spacing in a viewer.  A larger lens diameter allows comfortable viewing for people with various eye spacing without the necessity of fiddling with interocular adjustments.
If a viewer lens centerline is always slightly greater than the maximum infinity spacing on a slide then interocular viewing adj. is not necessary.

If one mounts slides without a standard infinity spacing then adj. interocular may be necessary.


Alan Lewis
3-d@xxxxxxxx
Serious viewers for serious Viewers
http://members.home.net/3-d


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/